<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Books: &#8220;An Outdated Technology?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/</link>
	<description>Beyond the Book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:52:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-13992</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelateageofprint.org/?p=453#comment-13992</guid>
		<description>I attend cushing academy and I can tell you for a fact that we read books ALL DAY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attend cushing academy and I can tell you for a fact that we read books ALL DAY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peirce</title>
		<link>http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peirce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelateageofprint.org/?p=453#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Raving lunacy! Dr. Tracy will raise up a generation of students with no historical consciousness, because there is an inherent presentist bias against history in electronic media.  No doubt many lazy or undisciplined students will cry out to be sent to Cushing, because they won&#039;t have to read books there, but these are students any serious school should want to be without.

I am at a loss to understand this.  What particularly mystifies me is why anyone would get rid of an entire book collection.  No doubt many of the items in the collection are not available electronically and could not be replaced.

I am surprised that there hasn&#039;t been more outcry about this.  In my view, the accrediting authorities should look seriously at revoking Cushing&#039;s accreditation.  Dr. Tracy&#039;s action suggests that it is no longer a school to be taken seriously.  Even if the accrediting authorities don&#039;t act, parents and students should, voting with their feet to avoid this den of anti-intellectualism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raving lunacy! Dr. Tracy will raise up a generation of students with no historical consciousness, because there is an inherent presentist bias against history in electronic media.  No doubt many lazy or undisciplined students will cry out to be sent to Cushing, because they won&#8217;t have to read books there, but these are students any serious school should want to be without.</p>
<p>I am at a loss to understand this.  What particularly mystifies me is why anyone would get rid of an entire book collection.  No doubt many of the items in the collection are not available electronically and could not be replaced.</p>
<p>I am surprised that there hasn&#8217;t been more outcry about this.  In my view, the accrediting authorities should look seriously at revoking Cushing&#8217;s accreditation.  Dr. Tracy&#8217;s action suggests that it is no longer a school to be taken seriously.  Even if the accrediting authorities don&#8217;t act, parents and students should, voting with their feet to avoid this den of anti-intellectualism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelateageofprint.org/?p=453#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Traditional books are best for subjects and titles that will be enjoyed for centuries. The electronic format is best for more transient subjects. Encyclopedias would be a good candidate for the digital format because they need to be updated frequently. Many newspapers have either gone digital or will soon go digital. Some magazines have also gone digital. This would leave out people who do not have access to the internet. Converting print to digital entails some challenges, most of them dealing with compatibility. With photos, JPEG has been well-established. Text is usually stored as HTML. In the early days of computers, compatibility was rarely an issue because data was rarely transmitted. Today, transmission of data is routine, made possible by having standardized formats, JPEG for pictures, MP3 for audio, HTML for text, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditional books are best for subjects and titles that will be enjoyed for centuries. The electronic format is best for more transient subjects. Encyclopedias would be a good candidate for the digital format because they need to be updated frequently. Many newspapers have either gone digital or will soon go digital. Some magazines have also gone digital. This would leave out people who do not have access to the internet. Converting print to digital entails some challenges, most of them dealing with compatibility. With photos, JPEG has been well-established. Text is usually stored as HTML. In the early days of computers, compatibility was rarely an issue because data was rarely transmitted. Today, transmission of data is routine, made possible by having standardized formats, JPEG for pictures, MP3 for audio, HTML for text, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Striphas</title>
		<link>http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Striphas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelateageofprint.org/?p=453#comment-337</guid>
		<description>@Phil: Sorry for the lag in responding.  At present I do not believe that the B&amp;N e-reader poses as many worries as, say, the Kindle, if for no other reason than B&amp;N still fancies itself to be a bookseller and not, like Amazon, a technology/web services company.  

Then again, the issue that lies in the middle of all this is that every one of the devices you mention is what Jonathan Zittrain calls a &quot;tethered appliance,&quot; which means that it&#039;s connected to some (corporate) entity who maintains rights to greater and lesser degrees over the device &amp; its content.  Right now I&#039;m writing an essay about what it may mean to learn to read on a device in which one&#039;s privacy and Fourth Amendment rights are anything but guaranteed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Phil: Sorry for the lag in responding.  At present I do not believe that the B&#038;N e-reader poses as many worries as, say, the Kindle, if for no other reason than B&#038;N still fancies itself to be a bookseller and not, like Amazon, a technology/web services company.  </p>
<p>Then again, the issue that lies in the middle of all this is that every one of the devices you mention is what Jonathan Zittrain calls a &#8220;tethered appliance,&#8221; which means that it&#8217;s connected to some (corporate) entity who maintains rights to greater and lesser degrees over the device &#038; its content.  Right now I&#8217;m writing an essay about what it may mean to learn to read on a device in which one&#8217;s privacy and Fourth Amendment rights are anything but guaranteed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Books are going out the door at Utah Libraries</title>
		<link>http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Books are going out the door at Utah Libraries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelateageofprint.org/?p=453#comment-336</guid>
		<description>[...] Ted (4 Sep 2009) Books: “An outdated technology?” The Late Age of Print [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ted (4 Sep 2009) Books: “An outdated technology?” The Late Age of Print [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelateageofprint.org/?p=453#comment-335</guid>
		<description>While this question might not directly link to this blog post specifically, I was wondering if you have thought or blogged about other devices besides the Kindle and/or the Sony e-reader. What about Barnes and Noble&#039;s e-reading device that you can download on your mobile phone? Do you believe the implications are the same? I would love to hear your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this question might not directly link to this blog post specifically, I was wondering if you have thought or blogged about other devices besides the Kindle and/or the Sony e-reader. What about Barnes and Noble&#8217;s e-reading device that you can download on your mobile phone? Do you believe the implications are the same? I would love to hear your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookless Libraries &#171; Georgia Library Media Association</title>
		<link>http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookless Libraries &#171; Georgia Library Media Association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 00:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelateageofprint.org/?p=453#comment-334</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;Books:  An Outdated Technology?&quot; from The Late Age of Print blog [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Books:  An Outdated Technology?&#8221; from The Late Age of Print blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Books: “An Outdated Technology?” — The Late Age of Print -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2009/09/04/books-outdated-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Books: “An Outdated Technology?” — The Late Age of Print -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelateageofprint.org/?p=453#comment-333</guid>
		<description>[...] this page was mentioned by Wessel &amp; Lieberm (@wlbooks), Seattle Book News (@seattlebooknews), Michael Lieberman (@bookpatrol), Addymac (@addymac), Megan Mitzel (@megsterr) and others. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this page was mentioned by Wessel &amp; Lieberm (@wlbooks), Seattle Book News (@seattlebooknews), Michael Lieberman (@bookpatrol), Addymac (@addymac), Megan Mitzel (@megsterr) and others. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

