After having spent the last five weeks blogging about about algorithmic culture, I figured both you and I deserved a change of pace. I’d like to share some new research of mine that was just published in a free, Open Access periodical called The International Journal of Communication.
My piece is called “The Visible College.” It addresses the many ways in which the form of scholarly publications — especially that of journal articles — obscures the density of the collaboration typical of academic authorship in the humanities. Here’s the first line: “Authorship may have died at the hands of a French philosopher drunk on Balzac, but it returned a few months later, by accident, when an American social psychologist turned people’s attention skyward.” Intrigued?
My essay appears as part of a featured section on the politics of academic labor in the discipline of communication. The forum is edited by my good friend and colleague, Jonathan Sterne. His introductory essay is a must-read for anyone in the field — and, for that matter, anyone who receives a paycheck for performing academic labor. (Well, maybe not my colleagues in the Business School….) Indeed it’s a wonderful, programmatic piece outlining how people in universities can make substantive change there, both individually and collectively. The section includes contributions from: Thomas A. Discenna; Toby Miller; Michael Griffin; Victor Pickard; Carol Stabile; Fernando P. Delgado; Amy Pason; Kathleen F. McConnell; Sarah Banet-Weiser and Alexandra Juhasz; Ira Wagman and Michael Z. Newman; Mark Hayward; Jayson Harsin; Kembrew McLeod; Joel Saxe; Michelle Rodino-Colocino; and two anonymous authors. Most of the essays are on the short side, so you can enjoy the forum in tasty, snack-sized chunks.
My own piece presented me with a paradox. Here I was, writing about how academic journal articles do a lousy job of representing all the labor that goes into them — in the form of an academic journal article! (At least it’s a Creative Commons-licensed, Open Access one.) Needless to say, I couldn’t leave it at that. I decided to create a dossier of materials relating to the production of the essay, which I’ve archived on another of my websites, The Differences and Repetitions Wiki (D&RW). The dossier includes all of my email exchanges with Jonathan Sterne, along with several early drafts of the piece. It’s astonishing to see just how much “The Visible College” changed as a result of my dialogue with Jonathan. It’s also astonishing to see, then, just how much of the story of academic production gets left out of that slim sliver of “thank-yous” we call the acknowledgments.
“The Visible College Dossier” is still a fairly crude instrument, admittedly. It’s an experiment — one among several others hosted on D&RW in which I try to tinker with the form and content of scholarly writing. I’d welcome your feedback on this or any other of my experiments, not to mention “The Visible College.”
Enjoy — and happy Halloween! Speaking of which, if you’re looking for something book related and Halloween-y, check out my blog post from a few years ago on the topic of anthropodermic bibliopegy.